Dstm’s Zcash Cuda miner

You can count it.

Both.

what do you mean by that? I use suprnova and it’s really hard to know the actual pool side hashrate because it’s changing ofcourse and there isn’t a good graph

Now I have to criticise…

Around 17:30 today after 6 Hours mining with my 900 GTXs. I recognised 6 Fee shares taken away. Every third share a fee share! Hashrate dipping in a valley. So I switched back to EWBF (without fee) and Pool shows same Hashrate…
https://zpool.guru/miners/t1b2SJKar2EActFQPM4XBA69mcv6HiUdaf2

EWBF shows about 2-3% less hashrate.

Mining now with 22x 1070’s and 2x 1070ti’s, DSTM gives a significantly higher hashrate than EWBF. The latest 0.5.6 dropped CPU usage which was previously causing my G4400 issues. With the roughly 11kSol/s I’m mining with I’m not seeing any weirdness with hashrates. Have been on Flypool for a few days now to monitor everything better, everything working great.

@ehri you probably need to adjust OC settings or something else is causing what you’re seeing. I’ve also been using the autorun script from @Undertrey, has been working excellent for days uninterrupted now.

Here’s me finally levelling off after switching cards, adjusting settings, etc. My hashrate drops are self-inflicted from fine-tuning. That averages out to 458 Sol/s for each card, will likely be higher once I stop messing with it and let it level out completely. Using 3850W at the wall between 4 rigs which comes to 2.86 Sol/s per Watt (includes mobo, etc).

2 Likes

Another person could criticise that using EWBF’s software and not paying at all for it is unfair

1 Like

OMG. I found here about this option.
So EWBF got quite some payments from me till now.
When mining equihash with dstm I am still using 0.5.4. I havent seen 6 fee shares in a row there. Those few CPU% get to around 12% max.

Mostly I am using ccminer 2.2.2 since weeks anyways…
It is much more profitable.

How is ccminer more profitable? I just tried it on the 1070 I have on my desktop, played with OC some. Got 430 Sol/s on it vs 470ish using DSTM?

I tested ccminer to 5x GTX 1080ti normal 710+ and ccminer 610max

Hello!

Sorry for the late reaction, but this topic was found by accident few minutes ago.
Martin from BTG here.

  1. The miner is awesome. I have been using it for Zcash mining before (I like Zcash a lot. I have some Zcash units that I will not sell soon.)

  2. Miner works for ZEC, ZCL, ZEN, BitcoinZ and BTG. I have made the tests. It is giving about 7% higher hashrate for GTX 1060 than EWBF.

  3. @Linda You have not provided the information about Duke Leto when he has requested 300 BTG for making the testnet and mainnet running and then for the 300 BTG for the Electrum Wallet. You can check the tickets with our communication in GitHub. If he was not going to make them, he could have told the rest of the world. Many people relied on him. We have been very pleasant when he contacted us with desire to help BTG, however we felt deceived when he did nothing at the end. He is awesome developer and I want to thank him for the work in the other cryptocurrencies, I have learned a lot from him, as well as from the Bitcoin and Zcash developers.

@StarbuckBG
If you want my answer and honest opinion you need make a Christmas :christmas_tree: donation.
Money will be donated for poor families and kids, Christmas gifts, clothes and other kids stuff. Accepting donations until 21 of December. 21 of December 23:59 crypto will be transferred and 22-25.12 me and other volunteers will make happy couple of kids and families having a nice Christmas. Receipts and pictures will available via photobucket.
Zcash: t1HubUBvfKcGVw4ieqzKWEWBsSmotz91y8a
Bitcoin Gold: GXiNjmzuiHKAiAmoZhmuJ6iLBdp1SX8xvN

That is really nice idea!

  1. I do not require you to answer anything to me, it is about the people, as we as solution providers must provide correct information to the people, else we are lying.
  2. Can you provide me the link with the campaign. I will send a donation. Again, it is really nice idea!

Hi any one can help on this issue could you please give me an advise?

First issue:
2017-12-09 1:15:20 AM|# GPU0 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 1:15:30 AM|sinit timeout
2017-12-09 1:15:33 AM|# GPU0 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 1:15:43 AM|sinit timeout
2017-12-09 1:15:45 AM|# GPU0 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 1:15:56 AM|sinit timeout
2017-12-09 1:15:58 AM|# GPU0 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 1:16:08 AM|sinit timeout

Second issue:
2017-12-09 3:49:41 PM|# connection closed by server r:0
2017-12-09 3:49:41 PM|# reconnecting
2017-12-09 3:49:52 PM|# GPU0 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:49:55 PM|# GPU1 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:49:58 PM|# GPU2 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:01 PM|# GPU3 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:05 PM|# GPU4 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:08 PM|# GPU5 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:11 PM|# connection closed by server r:0
2017-12-09 3:50:11 PM|# reconnecting
2017-12-09 3:50:31 PM|# GPU0 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:34 PM|# GPU1 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:37 PM|# GPU2 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:40 PM|# GPU3 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:44 PM|# GPU4 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:47 PM|# GPU5 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142
2017-12-09 3:50:50 PM|# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 003c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c…
2017-12-09 3:50:50 PM|# connection closed by server r:0
2017-12-09 3:50:50 PM|# reconnecting
2017-12-09 3:51:10 PM|# GPU0 connected to: zec.suprnova.cc:2142

have my configure having issue or the server zec.suprnova.cc issue?

my configured script → zm --dev --server zec.suprnova.cc --port 2142 --user x.1 --pass 1 --logfile -time

Any one can help?

zm --server zec-eu.suprnova.cc --port 2142 --user xyz --pass xyz

EU & US Mining Node: stratum+tcp://zec-eu.suprnova.cc:2142 (Backup: stratum+tcp://zec.suprnova.cc:2142 )
US Mining Node: stratum+tcp://zec-us.suprnova.cc:2142
China/Shenzhen: stratum+tcp://zec-cn.suprnova.cc:2142
Asia Pacific Mining Node: stratum+tcp://zec-apac.suprnova.cc:2142

1 Like

I am getting excellent results on my GTX 1070, about 475 sol/w at 140W. However with my 1080 it’s another story, I can not get more than 500 at 160W! I am talking about the standard 1080, not the Ti. With EWBF I get at least 530 - 540.

Please fix this!

What model 1070 are you using? I can only get 460 ish Sol/s for 155w with my MSI Armor OC 1070s. Power level set to 80%, +100 clock, +300 mem.

Keydogg I too have MSI Armor. Don’t be so shy on the OC hehe, you can increase core clock to at least 140, this is what I have. Memory +400 but it does not make much difference.

1 Like

I have 5 EVGA GTX 1070 FTW2 running at 500-510 Sol/s and a EVGA GTX 1070ti FTW2 running at 530 sol/s.

Next rig, I will buy only EVGA GTX 1070ti FTW2’s, best Sol/W, great heat dissipation too.

By the way, I’m running on Linux: fans at 85%, power limit: 150W, GPUGraphicsClockOffset=50, GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset=1400

Clock offset don’t make a lot of difference for me. 50 or 100, don’t give much Sol/s difference. Memory is another story, 1400 is optimal for the FTW2’s, and stable. At 1450, its starting to be unstable, and a GPU crash once on a while.

Version 0.5.7
reduce cpu load
minor performance improvements
con: use single pool connection
con: ssl: clear session data before reconnect
nvml: handle invalid values

Linux x64:
sha1 e7a38b2771e2b8d976435a6b569053d103bc9465
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11e1fSA2cl14xRL8sMA9BA3AhBGQNn4e4

Win x64:
sha1 808dcfc440beb6af98c84420e1299b211033c8ce
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WTJylr2uJYy_7-5isuja34ONu0WEBhin

2 Likes

0.5.7 shows 1% less hashrate and efficiency than 0.5.6. But 0.5.6. makes my windows 7 pro freeze after a few hours. Let’s see.

Are there any updated benchmarks for the 1080Ti GPUs? I tried the DSTM miner in its beginning, but I didn’t see any gains compared to the EWBF miner. So I’ve been sticking with what works. But very curious to hear if it has been optimized more for the higher end GTX cards yet.